From dd03daf3cac0876b760102d1a48c37b7e40c7cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tait Hoyem Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:22:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] update index --- ideas/index.md | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ideas/index.md b/ideas/index.md index fda5943..41d203b 100644 --- a/ideas/index.md +++ b/ideas/index.md @@ -187,8 +187,7 @@ So here's my plan for sticking to "free culture" licensing while still maintaini * (BY) You must credit the company. * (SA) You must keep the same license. * (NC) You may not make money selling the documents. -3. If a school is adamant that they want full control over the transcribed documents and do *not* want them published to the public, the price goes up by 25-35%, maybe even higher. - * Clearly they have enough money to have lawyers tell them they need to keep the documents "safe", so they can pay an extra "fine" for not cooperating with the "free culture" licenses. +3. If a school is willing to make the transcribed version of their courses available to the public, then I will offer a pretty substantial discount, probably in the range of 25-ish percent. I think it would be a great deal better for schools like SAIT, or AUArts, or VCC (smaller schools) to just contract out the hard stuff like this. Given my experience with a larger school (SFU), it makes me think even large schools could use help with it.