<!DOCTYPE html><htmllang="en"><head><metacharset="UTF-8"><title>BSD Journey, Part 1 | tait.tech</title><linkrel="stylesheet"href="/assets/css/style.css"><metaname="viewport"content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"><metaname="author"content="Tait Hoyem"><metaname="keywords"content=""><metaname="description"content=""></head><body><divid="wrapper"><header><nav><inputtype="checkbox"id="menu"><labelfor="menu">☰</label><divclass="menu-content"><ahref="/"class="nav-link">Home</a><ahref="/blog/"class="nav-link">Blog</a><ahref="https://github.com/TTWNO/"class="nav-link"target="_blank"rel="noopener noreferrer">Github</a></div></nav></header><main><article><header><h1class="post-title">BSD Journey, Part 1</h1><timedatetime="20-08-15"class="post-date">Saturday, August 15 2020</time></header><hr><p>As Linux becomes controlled by corporate sponsors and becomes more full of proprietary blobs, drivers, and even closed-source software like Steam, One may wonder if there are other options out there. For me, somebody that is intensely interested in security, there is one option: OpenBSD.</p><p>Now, my interest in OpenBSD has been going on for a long time. I started poking around for Linux alternatives way back a few years ago when Linus Torvalds decided to leave after he got in trouble for some <ahref="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/linus-torvalds-defends-his-right-to-shame-linux-kernel-developers/">unprofessional behaviour</a>. That said, Linus did come back to Linux development, but I knew that his abrasive style is what brought good code to the Linux kernel. I also knew that his ability to be critical would be hurt by the new <ahref="https://itsfoss.com/linux-code-of-conduct/">code of conduct</a>. It would become a tool for the SJW types to hammer on Linus for being a “white male, et al.”; It would become a tool for the easily offended to use to get their dumb code into Linux; It would become a tool for the corporatization, the HR-ification of Linux. Frankly, this does not interest me.</p><p>Now I’m sure that OpenBSD has its own internal policies that I disagree with. That said, Theo De Raadt is still at least known for calling Firefox an “amorphous peace of garbage” due to its lack of privilege separation. And, in their <ahref="https://openbsd.org/goals.html">project goals</a> page, they specifically mention:</p><blockquote><p>Be as politics-free as possible; solutions should be decided on the basis of technical merit.</p></blockquote><p>Now that’s something I can get behind! Bet you that’s not in the Linux COC?</p><p>He also went to university in my hometown, so that’s pretty cool! I can support a local madman who thinks he can make a better operating system than all those corporations. Maybe he was right, maybe not. What I know is I am excited to find out!</p><p>Wish my luck on my OpenBSD journey. I will post updates here along the way.</p><p>Happy hacking!</p></article></main><hr><footer> This page is mirrored on <ahref="https://beta.tait.tech/2020/08/15/openbsd1.html">beta.tait.tech</a>. </footer></div></body></html>
