You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

47 lines
2.8 KiB

From text to speech: The MITalk system
source for preparing the typed versions of the passages used in the reading com-
prehension condition. All fifteen passages were recorded on audio tape at a speak-
ing rate in excess of 180 words/minute for later playback. Two sets of response
booklets were prepared, one for the listening group and one for the reading group.
The booklets, which contained a varying number of multiple-choice questions
keyed to each paragraph, were arranged in order according to the presentation
schedule of the paragraphs on the audio tape. The booklets for subjects in the
reading group also included a typed copy of the passage immediately before the
appropriate set of questions. Appendix G also provides the set of questions cor-
responding to the passage.
13.4.1.3 Procedure Half of the forty-four subjects were assigned to the listening
group and the other half to the reading group. Subjects assigned to the reading
group were tested together in a classroom, while the subjects in the listening group
were tested in small groups of five or six subjects each using the listening facilities
of the previous studies. These subjects wore headphones and listened to the pas-
sages under the same conditions as the earlier subjects.
Instructions to the subjects in both groups emphasized that the purpose of the
study was to evaluate how well individuals could comprehend and understand con-
tinuous synthetic speech produced by a reading machine. Subjects in the listening
group were told that they would hear narrative passages about a wide variety of
topics and that their task was to answer the multiple-choice questions that were
keyed to the particular passages as best as they could based on the information
contained in the passages they heard. Similar instructions were provided to the
reading comprehension group.
As in the previous word-recognition study, the listening comprehension group
was presented with test passages in a self-paced format with the experimenter
present in the testing room operating the tape recorder via remote control. A given
test passage was presented only once for listening, after which, subjects im-
mediately turned their booklets to the appropriate set of test questions.
The subjects in the reading comprehension group were permitted to read each
passage only once and were explicitly told that they should not go back over the
passage after reading it or while answering the questions. This procedure was a
departure from the typical methods used in administering standardized reading
comprehension tests. Usually, the test passage is available to the subject for in-
spection and re-reading during the entire testing session. However, for present
purposes, we felt that comparisons between reading and listening comprehension
might be more closely matched by limiting exposure to one pass through the
materials.
164