You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

50 lines
2.7 KiB

Some measures of intelligibility and comprehension
B77 tape recorder at 7.5 ips with a 3.0 second pause between successive items.
Approximately half of the items in a given test list differed in the initial consonant
while the remaining half differed in the final consonant.
13.2.1.3 Procedure The seventy-two subjects were divided up into twelve inde-
pendent groups containing six subjects each for testing. Two groups of subjects
were assigned to each of the six original test lists. Subjects were told that this was
a test dealing with isolated word recognition and that they were to indicate which
word out of six possible alternatives was the one they heard on each trial. Forced-
choice response forms were provided to subjects to record their judgements. Sub-
jects were encouraged to guess if they were not sure, but to respond on each trial.
No feedback was provided to subjects during the course of testing. Subjects were,
however, explicitly informed that the test items were generated on a computer and
that the experiment was designed to evaluate the intelligibility of the synthetic
speech. An example of the test format is provided in Appendix D.
Testing was carried out in a small experimental room in the Speech Percep-
tion Laboratory in the Department of Psychology at Indiana University. This room
is equipped with six individual cubicles. The audio tapes were reproduced on an
Ampex AG-500 tape recorder and presented to subjects via TDH-39 matched and
calibrated headphones at a comfortable listening level of about 80 dB SPL peak
reading on a VTVM. A low-level (60 dB), broad-band (0-10 kHz) white noise
source (Grason Stadler Model 1724) was also mixed with the speech to mask tape
hiss, some nonstationary computer-generated background noise picked up during
the recording at MIT, and any ambient noise in the local environment during test-
ing.
13.2.2 Results and discussion
Although the Modified Rhyme Test employed real words, our interest was focused
on the phoneme errors and resulting perceptual confusions. Overall performance
on the test was very good with a total error rate, averaged across both initial- and
final-syllable positions, of only 6.9 percent. Performance was somewhat better for
consonants in initial position (4.6 percent errors) than final position (9.3 percent
€ITOrS).
The distribution of all errors across various manner classes is shown graphi-
calfy in Figure 13-1 for initial- and final-syllable positions separately.
Since the consonants comprising the various manner classes occurred with
unequal frequencies in the Modified Rhyme Test, the observed error rates in the
data may not be representative estimates of the intelligibility of the same
phonemes in continuous speech. Nevertheless, performance is generally excellent
153